For Gaming and Interactive Entertainment

Cognitive Sovereignty Self-Audit for Gaming and Interactive Entertainment

This audit measures whether your studio's creative and operational decisions remain grounded in human judgement or have become subordinate to AI optimisation systems. Your score reveals how much sovereignty you have retained over game design, player experience, and live operations.

This takes about two minutes. Answer honestly.

Download printable PDF

1. When your design team proposes a mechanic that AI engagement models predict will underperform, how do you typically respond?

2. How does your live operations team decide which in-game offers and events to prioritise for players?

3. When using generative AI tools like Midjourney or Inworld AI for art and dialogue, who decides what gets used in the final game?

4. How do junior developers and designers learn game craft at your studio?

5. Your monetisation strategy is primarily informed by which of these?

6. When a Unity AI system recommends narrative changes to improve player retention, how does your creative director respond?

7. How often does your game's overall aesthetic or mechanical identity change in response to AI-generated design suggestions?

8. If an AI tool suggests a feature or monetisation approach that maximises engagement but feels manipulative to your team, what happens?

Your score

Read Chapter 1 Free

Keep in mind

Related reads

The Book — Out Now

Cognitive Sovereignty: How To Think For Yourself When AI Thinks For You

Read the first chapter free.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.