For Arts and Culture

40 Questions Arts and Culture Should Ask Before Trusting AI

When Midjourney generates an image, when ChatGPT drafts your funding application, when audience data shapes what you programme, you need to know what you are actually deciding about. These questions help you keep your judgement in charge.

These are suggestions. Use the ones that fit your situation.

Download printable PDF

Artistic Practice and Authorship

1 When you use Midjourney or DALL-E to generate visual work, can you articulate what human decisions shaped the output (your prompts, iterations, selections, combinations with other materials)?
2 Does the work you have made with generative tools still reflect your specific artistic concerns, or has the tool's aesthetic preferences taken over your voice?
3 If you are using Runway ML for video work, where does the machine learning's contribution end and your creative judgement begin in the final piece?
4 When you credit your work, are you being honest about whether it was made with AI assistance, and does your audience have that information?
5 Are you using AI tools to explore ideas you could not explore before, or are you using them because they are faster than your actual artistic process?
6 If you removed the AI tool from your workflow, would the work still be recognisably yours?
7 Does using Adobe Firefly or similar tools to accelerate production phases change what risks you are willing to take in your work?
8 When you iterate with a generative tool, are you making intentional creative choices or accepting the first thing that looks acceptable?
9 What artistic problems require human struggle and experimentation, and are you outsourcing those to AI when you should not be?
10 If another artist used the exact same prompts in Midjourney or DALL-E, would they make the same work you did?

Curation and Programming Decisions

11 When you review audience analytics that an AI system has flagged as high-engagement content, do you know what behaviour that metric actually measures?
12 Has AI audience data ever recommended that you programme something you do not think is good, and did you do it anyway?
13 Are you programming work based on what existing audiences already respond to, or are you risking work that introduces them to something new?
14 If you ignored the AI recommendations about what to show, what would you programme instead, and why would that be the better choice?
15 When AI systems analyse which artists or art forms drive engagement, are those systems missing whole categories of value your organisation actually cares about?
16 Do the artists you think are most important get recommended by AI audience data, or does the algorithm favour something else?
17 Has an AI system ever recommended against programming something because of predicted low engagement, and did you consider that recommendation seriously enough?
18 What does your curation look like in five years if you keep following AI engagement recommendations?
19 Are you curating for the audiences you have right now, or the audiences you want to develop?
20 When you make a curation choice that contradicts AI recommendations, can you articulate why your human judgement was right?

Funding, Grants, and Applications

21 If you used ChatGPT to draft or edit your funding application, does the final text still sound like your organisation, or does it sound like a generic arts organisation?
22 When you submit a grant application written with AI assistance, are you competing fairly against other organisations that wrote theirs without that help?
23 Does your AI-assisted application articulate your specific artistic vision, or does it say what you think funders want to hear?
24 Have you compared a funding application you wrote yourself against one you drafted with ChatGPT to see where they actually differ?
25 If a funder receives fifty applications and half were written with AI assistance, what happens to their ability to distinguish between organisations with real vision and those without?
26 When AI polishes your application language, does it remove evidence of the real constraints or challenges your organisation faces?
27 Are you using AI to make weak ideas sound better, or to express strong ideas more clearly?
28 Does your grant writing describe what you actually do, or what you think will get funded?
29 If you won funding partly because of an AI-optimised application, will you be able to deliver on what that application promised?
30 What parts of your artistic practice or mission are hardest to explain to funders, and are those exactly the parts you should not let AI rewrite?

Institutional Culture and Values

31 When your organisation adopts an AI tool for routine decisions, what human skill or judgement becomes harder to develop in your staff?
32 Are junior staff learning to make curatorial or administrative judgements, or are they learning to follow what the AI recommends?
33 If an AI system makes a decision that your organisation disagrees with, do you have the expertise left in-house to override it?
34 What decisions in your organisation should never be delegated to an algorithm, even if the algorithm is more efficient?
35 When you choose an AI tool, are you thinking about what your organisation will look like in ten years if you keep using it?
36 Does your organisation have a genuine artistic perspective, or are you becoming what AI systems predict audiences will accept?
37 What would it mean for your organisation to lose the ability to make a choice that no AI system would recommend?
38 When you adopt AI tools, are you doing it because they solve a real problem, or because competitors are using them?
39 If you stopped using AI systems tomorrow, could your organisation still function and make good decisions?
40 What does cultural leadership mean if you are optimising for what algorithms predict rather than what you believe matters?

How to use these questions

Related reads

The Book — Out Now

Cognitive Sovereignty: How To Think For Yourself When AI Thinks For You

Read the first chapter free.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.