For CTOs and Engineering Leaders

Cognitive Sovereignty Self-Audit for Chief Technology Officers

This audit measures whether you retain independent technical judgement when making architecture and strategy decisions alongside AI tools. It identifies specific areas where your team may be deferring critical thinking to AI recommendations rather than evaluating them first.

This takes about two minutes. Answer honestly.

Download printable PDF

1. When a team proposes a major architectural change suggested by GitHub Copilot or Claude, how do you evaluate it?

2. Your engineers ask whether to build a feature in-house or buy a third-party solution. How do you guide the decision?

3. When an AI tool generates code that works but you do not fully understand the logic, what typically happens?

4. Your organisation is deciding which AI tools to adopt across engineering teams. How is this decision made?

5. An engineer says they cannot debug a problem in production because the relevant code was generated by an AI tool and they do not understand it fully. How do you respond?

6. When you need to articulate your organisation's technical strategy to the board, how do you develop it?

7. Your team has adopted Cursor or GitHub Copilot at scale. How do you ensure they retain debugging and problem-solving skills?

8. A vendor claims their product is better because it integrates AI recommendations into your architecture decisions. How do you assess this claim?

Your score

Read Chapter 1 Free

Keep in mind

Related reads

The Book — Out Now

Cognitive Sovereignty: How To Think For Yourself When AI Thinks For You

Read the first chapter free.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.