For Video Producers
Video producers are outsourcing the decisions that used to matter most: which story beat lands harder, where the cut should live, why one shot works and another does not. When you stop making these calls yourself, you stop knowing how to make them at all.
These are observations, not criticism. Recognising the pattern is the first step.
ChatGPT optimises for clarity and completeness, not for the rhythm that keeps viewers watching. A script can be correct and still fail to create the tension, release, and surprise that makes audiences stay through the next shot.
The fix
Before you use any ChatGPT output, mark where the emotional peaks should be, then rewrite those passages by hand to add specificity, contradiction, or a detail that makes the audience lean in.
AI generates angles based on what worked in training data, not what your specific viewers need to hear. You end up with a script that sounds universal and speaks to no one.
The fix
Write down three things you know about your audience's real objections or desires, then have ChatGPT regenerate the script angle while you hold those three things constant.
ChatGPT reaches for 'This brings us to', 'Let us explore', and 'Consider for a moment' because these patterns are frequent in its training. They flag the script as written by committee, not by you.
The fix
Search your script for common filler transitions like 'moving on to', 'it is important to note', 'as mentioned earlier', and replace each one with a transition specific to your shot sequence or narrative move.
You tell yourself the AI saved you time, so you spend less time rewriting. What actually happens is you spend your time reviewing instead of creating, and the script keeps the shape the AI gave it.
The fix
Treat ChatGPT output as a first draft you will rewrite completely, not as a time saver. Ask it to generate three different structural approaches, then assemble the final script by hand from the best parts of each.
You start writing for ElevenLabs instead of for your audience. The script becomes shorter, simpler, and less likely to surprise anyone because it is optimised for voice synthesis.
The fix
undefined
Adobe Premiere AI flags cuts that maximise watch time based on aggregate viewer data. Your specific project might need a longer pause, an awkward cut for effect, or a shot held for emotional impact instead of algorithmic impact.
The fix
Generate the AI assembly cut, then before you touch anything, write down the three emotional or narrative moments you want to protect, and reject any AI suggestion that weakens those moments.
Descript removes 'um' and 'uh' because they are technically filler. Sometimes those moments of hesitation, breath, or authentic stumble are what makes the speaker credible.
The fix
Use Descript to flag filler words, but listen to each flagged moment yourself and keep the ones that serve the story of who your speaker is.
Adobe Premiere AI cuts based on colour, motion, and sound rhythm. A static interview shot with rich dialogue might be cut too short because the algorithm sees no motion to hold it.
The fix
For any scene with dialogue or narration, set your own cut points first based on what the speaker or subject is communicating, then check if the AI suggestions conflict with those points.
When Adobe Premiere suggests a transition, you use it because it is there, not because it serves the story. You stop choosing dissolves versus cuts versus J-cuts because you are reviewing suggestions instead of making decisions.
The fix
Disable auto-transition suggestions and decide every transition type by asking what emotional or narrative information it needs to carry.
RunwayML can generate transitions and effects, but the moment you start accepting 'close enough' from AI, you have given away your eye for what a transition should feel like in your specific project.
The fix
Use RunwayML only for effects you do not have time to source or build, and only if the effect serves a specific visual purpose you have already identified.
AI recommends formats based on engagement metrics and what platforms reward. You might follow advice to make everything 9:16 vertical or three minutes or heavy on B-roll, and then realise you do not have the footage or time to match those specs.
The fix
Before you ask AI for format advice, list what you can actually produce, then ask the AI to suggest within those constraints instead of letting it suggest ideal metrics you cannot meet.
ChatGPT can tell you what audiences generally like. It cannot tell you why three viewers watched your last video twice or why your comments section cares about something your script did not address.
The fix
Spend one hour per month watching user comments, rewatches, and drop-off points in your analytics, and keep a notebook of patterns you find, then brief your AI tools with those specific insights before asking for suggestions.
You uploaded rough cuts to AI tools that ranked shots by technical metrics like focus clarity or motion detection. You deleted takes that were slightly soft but had the right emotional weight because the algorithm said they were worse.
The fix
Review all AI flagged shots yourself first, and keep a file of 'technically imperfect but creatively correct' takes so you rebuild your sense of when to trust your eye over the algorithm.
Every producer says the same thing: the algorithm rewards short, fast-cut, high-contrast, text-heavy content. What they do not say is that they could choose to make something slower and more specific and accept smaller reach because it serves the story better.
The fix
For your next project, identify one structural or stylistic choice that the algorithm would punish, make that choice intentionally, and measure the result against your own creative goals instead of platform metrics.
Worth remembering
The Book — Out Now
Read the first chapter free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.